Book a Demo

How to automate TMS load entry from rate confirmations

To automate TMS load entry, start with one task: turn an emailed rate confirmation into a draft load. Let your dispatcher check it before it goes into the system.

A TMS is the software your team uses to manage loads. A rate confirmation, often called a rate con, holds the agreed load details. Moving those details from an email into a TMS can mean a lot of retyping.

AI can help read the document and fill in a draft. Saving that draft in your TMS is a separate step. It depends on the access and import tools your system allows.

Start with the details dispatch types twice

Choose one inbox or folder for the trial. Use only mail and files your business has the right to access. Keep the original email and rate con linked to each draft so dispatch can check the source.

Start with these fields:

  • Pickup and delivery names and full addresses.
  • Stop order, dates, and appointment times.
  • Agreed rate and the broker's load number.
  • Equipment needs and special instructions.

Keep dates and times exactly as shown until someone checks them. A pickup window is not the same as a booked appointment. If the time zone is missing, flag it rather than guess.

The same rule applies to the rate. Keep the load's agreed price separate from fuel pay or other fees when the source lists them that way. Do not add a charge that is not in the document.

Build a draft, then check it

A useful workflow has a clear point where a person takes over:

  1. A rate con arrives in the approved inbox.
  2. The tool reads the email and file and pulls out the load details.
  3. It puts those details in the right fields in a draft.
  4. It marks missing, unclear, or conflicting details for review.
  5. Dispatch checks the draft against the source.
  6. An approved connection or import sends the checked load to the TMS.
  7. The workflow records the TMS load ID and shows whether the save worked.

Document tools can pull text, forms, and tables from files. Amazon Textract's guide explains one example of this kind of tool. That does not mean each field will be right, or that the tool has a connection to your TMS.

A tool that follows fixed steps may be enough for this job. You do not need an agent with broad control of your inbox or dispatch work just to prepare a load.

Give problem loads a clear review path

Keep the source file next to the draft. Let the reviewer fix a field, ask the broker a question, or hold the load. Do not force a save when the source is unclear.

Send these cases to review:

  • A scan is blurred or part of a page is missing.
  • The email and attached file show different rates or dates.
  • The load has extra stops or an unclear stop order.
  • A newer rate con changes a load already in the TMS.
  • The same file arrives twice.
  • An address, load number, or appointment is missing.

Check for an existing load before you create one. Use the broker and load number along with your team's other checks. A repeated email should not create a second load. A changed rate con should be reviewed as a change, not treated as a new job by default.

Amazon's document guidance notes that file quality affects results. It also recommends using confidence scores and human review based on the risk of an error. A high score is not proof that a load is correct.

Set clear limits on what the workflow can do. Reading an email should not give it the right to send a reply, accept new terms, book a truck, or change a live load without the right approval.

Check your TMS connection before you build

Ask your TMS provider how an outside tool can create a draft load. An API is a way for two software systems to share data. Some systems may allow an API, a file import, or a provider-approved connection. Check your own product, plan, and permissions before you choose a path.

Ask these questions:

  • Can the connection create drafts, or does it save live loads at once?
  • Which fields and stop types does it support?
  • How does it report a failed or partial save?
  • Can it check for an existing load before it tries again?
  • Who can approve changes, and where is that action logged?
  • What setup, access, and fees does the provider require?

If your TMS has no suitable import path, the first version can still prepare checked details for dispatch to enter. That is less complete than a direct import. Make that limit clear when you judge the trial.

One-click import is a goal to test for a specific connection. It is not a promise that every load source and TMS will work that way. A custom TMS also needs real access to each source, clear field rules, and tests for failed saves.

Measure the time saved on your own loads

Time your current process before the trial. Start when dispatch opens the rate con and stop when the checked load is saved. Include time spent fixing mistakes.

Then measure the same work with the new process. Count review time, fixes, failed imports, and any manual entry still needed. Compare similar loads so a simple one-stop load is not set against a complex trip.

Track:

  • Minutes of staff work per correctly saved load.
  • Fields that needed a fix.
  • Loads sent to review and why.
  • Duplicate attempts and failed saves.
  • Time spent on setup and ongoing support.

Subtract the new staff time from the old staff time to find the time saved per load. If the result is negative, the new process took more time. Use your own measured load count to estimate the weekly effect.

These are checks to run, not promised results. A tool is useful only if the full job takes less work without hiding errors or shifting the work to someone else.

Try one load-entry workflow first

Start with a small set of real, approved rate cons. Include clean files, revised files, and a few hard cases. Agree on what must be right before a load can be saved. Keep dispatch in charge of review while you learn where the tool fails.

For help choosing a first task, read how to choose your first task to automate.

If you want to see Core Agentic's platform, schedule a free demo. Bring the name of your TMS and a redacted sample rate con. We can discuss the workflow and what access would need to be checked. A demo does not confirm that your systems can connect.